Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

Hms Dragon arrives in Portsmouth Options
Tomick
#1 Posted : 02 September 2011 17:53:58

Rank: Pro

Groups:

Joined: 24/08/2009
Posts: 48,827
Points: -13,348
Zeptrader
#2 Posted : 02 September 2011 20:22:38

Rank: Pro

Groups:

Joined: 24/08/2009
Posts: 48,827
Points: -13,348
That is one ugly ship, damn they should build another Hood, that'll scare the hell outta the Germans.

thanks for the link Tom.
mavrickandgoose
#3 Posted : 02 September 2011 21:03:38

Rank: Pro

Build-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of Honour
Groups: Registered

Joined: 17/03/2010
Posts: 127
Points: 329
Location: cornwall/portsmouth uk
UGLY?!?! I do see where your coming from, but up close the 45's look very very nice
steve
MWG
#4 Posted : 02 September 2011 22:17:32

Rank: Super-Elite

Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalPurple Medal: Super active service medal for 1000 postsBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of HonourRed Medal: Red Medal
Groups: Registered

Joined: 24/04/2010
Posts: 5,787
Points: 17,662
Location: Stafford, United Kingdom
Looks great shipBigGrin Cool
MWG BUILD DIARIES: HMS VICTORY, SOVEREIGN OF THE SEAS, SAN FRANCISCO II, HMS HOOD, HMS ENDEAVOUR LONGBOAT, HMS VICTORY X-SECTION, 007 DB5, NISSAN GTR, CUTTY SARK, RB7, AKAGI, BARK HMS ENDEAVOUR, HUMMER H1, MITSUBISHI ZERO.

Eddieboy
#5 Posted : 02 September 2011 22:29:15

Rank: Pro

Groups:

Joined: 24/08/2009
Posts: 48,827
Points: -13,348
I agree those 45's don't take a good picture but in in person they look great and the Sea Viper system is not to be messed with!

Ed,
Mike Turpin
#6 Posted : 02 September 2011 22:57:48

Rank: Vice-Master
Publisher Medal: Featured Build of the Month
Groups: Registered

Joined: 13/10/2011
Posts: 851
Points: 2,628
Location: Leeds, Yorkshire
My immediate reaction was to think that HMS Dragon is visually unattractive(ugly!). I reckon my grandson will be able to build a pretty accurate model from his lego bricks!

I am reminded of a Ford Transit white van compared with an Aston Martin DB5, for example!

Having said that, transit vans do a very good job simply because of their design and I'm sure that Dragon will fulfil its air defence role because it has been designed just for that. I assume that the wierd angular suoerstructure is all to do with stealth technology and avoiding radar detection??

Mike T
Tomick
#7 Posted : 02 September 2011 23:53:25

Rank: Pro

Groups:

Joined: 24/08/2009
Posts: 48,827
Points: -13,348
Gone are the days of ships packed with guns, Its a ship for current times - High intensity war fighting, anti-piracy, anti-smuggling, disaster relief and surveillance, the type 45 might not look it but it packs a mighty punch in being able to defend against multiple and simultaneous attack!

jonny7england
#8 Posted : 03 September 2011 10:07:04

Rank: Elite

Publisher Medal: Featured Build of the MonthActive Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalPurple Medal: Super active service medal for 1000 postsBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of HonourRed Medal: Red Medal
Groups: Registered

Joined: 22/03/2010
Posts: 2,065
Points: 6,295
Location: Gorleston-on-sea
Like Mr.T's other post yesterday about the Victory broadside...I wouldn't like to be on the receiving end of what the type 45 can deal out!! Unattractive she may be to some, but her design makes her pretty damn near invisible at sea...I reckon we will be hearing more of this new type of warship in the years to come...
Blink Blink
Current Builds: Deagostini HMS Victory: Deagostini HMS Sovereign of the seas. Completed Builds: Del Prado: HMAS Bounty: Hachette: RMS Titanic: Del Prado: Cutty Sark...
Dontshootme
#9 Posted : 03 September 2011 10:32:03

Rank: Master
Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalPurple Medal: Super active service medal for 1000 postsBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of Honour
Groups: Registered

Joined: 15/04/2010
Posts: 1,266
Points: 3,841
Location: The Quantock Hills,Somerset
Stealth technology certainly doesn't help these ships to look prettyCrying but they do have some pleasing lines to the hull,definitely built for speed.
What I would like to know is why they decided to get the "Pimp my Ride" team involved & paint the enormous dragon on herConfused ,none of the other 45's have a representation of their names on the hull......maybe they need sponsorship to run the navy these days & it's a company logoCrying
Now there's a thought for the government....commercially sponsored armed forces...they wouldn't need to scrap unused ships,planes etcLOL Blink Blink Blink
Rob Nolli Illigitimi Carborundum!!!
Current Builds:HMS Victory,SV Thermopylae
Tomick
#10 Posted : 03 September 2011 12:04:57

Rank: Pro

Groups:

Joined: 24/08/2009
Posts: 48,827
Points: -13,348
I suspect that the Dragon logo is not a permanent addition, the ship has just been lauched and has yet to undego sea trials, where I think the logo will then disapear; what's next, a Nike tick on Hms Nike LOL
z8000783
#11 Posted : 03 September 2011 13:55:20

Rank: Elite
Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalPurple Medal: Super active service medal for 1000 postsBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of Honour
Groups: Unapproved

Joined: 24/05/2010
Posts: 1,761
Points: 5,351
Location: London & Greece
Whether or not they are ugly or simply functional they certainly seem to lack character.

I took this of Dauntless last year.



All 6 are assembly line built and look the same. Shame in many ways but understandable.

John
Austin
#12 Posted : 03 September 2011 20:17:52

Rank: Pro

Groups:

Joined: 24/08/2009
Posts: 48,827
Points: -13,348
Personally I think it looks awesome, not ugly. Aggressive and purposeful.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2009, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.115 seconds.
DeAgostini