Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

Bearding Line Options
birdaj2
#1 Posted : 04 February 2013 11:27:51

Rank: Super-Elite

Publisher Medal: Featured Build of the MonthActive Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalPurple Medal: Super active service medal for 1000 postsTurquoise Medal: Turquoise Medal for model making know-how contributionBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of HonourRed Medal: Red Medal
Groups: Registered

Joined: 31/05/2010
Posts: 5,679
Points: 17,011
Location: Wiltshire
Hope someone can advise on the following as I am getting myself confused.

In the Victory build we reduced the thickness of the false keel to take into account that when the planking was applied the overall thickness of keel and planks would match the stern post thickness.

In the SotS build we are only reducing the strength blocks that were added.

I know that at least one builder has reduced the thickness of the keel but the magazine and official build do not.

Can anyone please advise if this should be done or not?

Kind regards

Tony
Happy Modelling

BUILDING: Hachette Spitfire Mk 1A, Constructo Mayflower
SUBSCRIPTION COMPLETE (Awaiting building): USS Constitution, Sovereign of the Seas, 1:200 Bismarck (Hachette)
COMPLETED: Porsche 911, E-Type Jaguar, Lam Countach
NMBROOK
#2 Posted : 04 February 2013 14:21:50

Rank: Pro

Groups:

Joined: 24/08/2009
Posts: 48,827
Points: -13,348
I reduced my keel thickness to 2mm then thinned the first planking as well.If you don't then the planking will make the stern post area far too thick.It is left full thickness on the stock build but looks wrong because the planking is proud of the stern post,they should be the same thickness.At the end of the day its your decision,
Regards,
Nigel
MWG
#3 Posted : 04 February 2013 14:44:29

Rank: Super-Elite

Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalPurple Medal: Super active service medal for 1000 postsBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of HonourRed Medal: Red Medal
Groups: Registered

Joined: 24/04/2010
Posts: 5,787
Points: 17,662
Location: Stafford, United Kingdom
birdaj2 wrote:
Hope someone can advise on the following as I am getting myself confused.

In the Victory build we reduced the thickness of the false keel to take into account that when the planking was applied the overall thickness of keel and planks would match the stern post thickness.

In the SotS build we are only reducing the strength blocks that were added.

I know that at least one builder has reduced the thickness of the keel but the magazine and official build do not.

Can anyone please advise if this should be done or not?

Kind regards

Tony


Hi Tony,

I reduced the thickness down to 1mm to take into consideration the 2x 2mm planks and the 2x 1/2mm second planking.

I felt this action worked for me in what I am hoping to acheive with my build,in having the rudder the same thickness as the keel, but at the end of the day each member must decide for themselves if they intend to go against the instructions or not. I can not advise you on that.

Go with what you feel is right and comfortable for you.BigGrin
Kind regards Mike

MWG BUILD DIARIES: HMS VICTORY, SOVEREIGN OF THE SEAS, SAN FRANCISCO II, HMS HOOD, HMS ENDEAVOUR LONGBOAT, HMS VICTORY X-SECTION, 007 DB5, NISSAN GTR, CUTTY SARK, RB7, AKAGI, BARK HMS ENDEAVOUR, HUMMER H1, MITSUBISHI ZERO.

birdaj2
#4 Posted : 04 February 2013 15:15:47

Rank: Super-Elite

Publisher Medal: Featured Build of the MonthActive Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalPurple Medal: Super active service medal for 1000 postsTurquoise Medal: Turquoise Medal for model making know-how contributionBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of HonourRed Medal: Red Medal
Groups: Registered

Joined: 31/05/2010
Posts: 5,679
Points: 17,011
Location: Wiltshire
Nigel/Mike

Many thanks for taking the time to reply.

Will follow your lead and reduce this part of the false keel.

Thanks again

Tony
Happy Modelling

BUILDING: Hachette Spitfire Mk 1A, Constructo Mayflower
SUBSCRIPTION COMPLETE (Awaiting building): USS Constitution, Sovereign of the Seas, 1:200 Bismarck (Hachette)
COMPLETED: Porsche 911, E-Type Jaguar, Lam Countach
court orchard
#5 Posted : 04 February 2013 15:30:49

Rank: Master


Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalPurple Medal: Super active service medal for 1000 postsTurquoise Medal: Turquoise Medal for model making know-how contributionBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of HonourRed Medal: Red Medal
Groups: Registered

Joined: 05/09/2012
Posts: 1,400
Points: 4,690
Location: Beaminster, Dorset
Just a word of caution, take care in departing from the official build as it can sometimes have unforeseen consequences, particularly in a part work as we can't see too far ahead.
As a beginner I would advise following Mr T's official build. Who isn't thinning his Keel.
I am not thinning mine either because as far as I can see, there is going to be a Stern stem piece inserted into the overhanging rear planks and then the planks will be tapered down onto this. But I might be wrong.
But as Mike and Nigel say the choice is yours.
Andy

Building:Samurai Armour, SOTS, Victory X-Section, Bismarck, D51
Finished:WW I Bavarian NCO, Caldercraft HM Bark Endeavour FFG 58 Samuel B Roberts,
birdaj2
#6 Posted : 04 February 2013 17:41:16

Rank: Super-Elite

Publisher Medal: Featured Build of the MonthActive Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalPurple Medal: Super active service medal for 1000 postsTurquoise Medal: Turquoise Medal for model making know-how contributionBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of HonourRed Medal: Red Medal
Groups: Registered

Joined: 31/05/2010
Posts: 5,679
Points: 17,011
Location: Wiltshire
Andy

I think that is some sound advice and on reflection will follow the official build. I take my hat off (so to speak) to the excellent skills of some of the experienced builders but would agree that I could end up digging myself into a hole I cannot recover from.

Many thanks to all that have replied to this query and for input on both possible options.

I really would like to finish this model as my victory stopped at that rib 15 issue which totally scuppered me.

Many thanks again for everyone's time it's much appreciated

Kind regards

Tony
Happy Modelling

BUILDING: Hachette Spitfire Mk 1A, Constructo Mayflower
SUBSCRIPTION COMPLETE (Awaiting building): USS Constitution, Sovereign of the Seas, 1:200 Bismarck (Hachette)
COMPLETED: Porsche 911, E-Type Jaguar, Lam Countach
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2009, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.121 seconds.
DeAgostini