Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

Is it me? Options
CaptnBirdseye
#1 Posted : 22 March 2017 15:18:08

Rank: Superelite

Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalPurple Medal: Super active service medal for 1000 postsBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of HonourRed Medal: Red Medal
Groups: Registered

Joined: 10/05/2010
Posts: 2,608
Points: 7,519
Location: Lincolnshire
Hi
Is it me, or does this build look easier than Victory? maybe it's because the bulkheads are pre-formed. Either way she looks a beauty! BigGrin
Tomick
#2 Posted : 22 March 2017 15:59:46

Rank: Pro

Groups:

Joined: 24/08/2009
Posts: 48,051
Points: -13,308
It is BigGrin
greyhawk
#3 Posted : 22 March 2017 17:11:21

Rank: Master

Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalPurple Medal: Super active service medal for 1000 postsBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of HonourRed Medal: Red Medal
Groups: Registered

Joined: 19/05/2015
Posts: 1,419
Points: 4,272
Location: Darmstadt, Germany
It's definitely more forgiving when planking than the Victory. HMS Victory only has a single planking layer as opposed to the two to three layers of the Soleil Royal, so you need to lay the planks pretty much perfect from the get go. There are also more complicated bends to do in the stern then with Soleil Royal.

Cutting out the gun ports is much easier with the SR thanks to the gun port strips. They also lend much needed robustness to the ship and a clear line for the first planking row.

The one area where Victory is easier is the bow. There's a lot more bow formers employed which the SR is lacking. It's quite easy to introduce dimples in the SRs bow if one doesn't specifically focus on avoiding them. In retrospect I would fill up the bow area with balsa blocks if I had to do it again.

CaptnBirdseye
#4 Posted : 22 March 2017 22:58:54

Rank: Superelite

Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalPurple Medal: Super active service medal for 1000 postsBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of HonourRed Medal: Red Medal
Groups: Registered

Joined: 10/05/2010
Posts: 2,608
Points: 7,519
Location: Lincolnshire
Good points, well made. Do you have to fit the sails or can you leave it bare? It doesn't say in the instructions like it does for Victory.
magpie1832
#5 Posted : 23 March 2017 08:32:13

Rank: Super-Elite

Publisher Medal: Featured Build of the MonthActive Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalPurple Medal: Super active service medal for 1000 postsTurquoise Medal: Turquoise Medal for model making know-how contributionBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of HonourRed Medal: Red Medal
Groups: Registered

Joined: 11/11/2009
Posts: 3,432
Points: 10,280
Location: Bâe Colwyn, Wales
The instructions only give you the option for the sails. If you were to want it without then you would need to find rigging plans for it.
Mostly the rigging is the same though.

Chris
On the bench

1/350 Revell Tirpitz Platinum Edition (Pontos PE and Wooden deck) plus extra Eduard PE set and extra MK1 door sets.




greyhawk
#6 Posted : 23 March 2017 10:12:30

Rank: Master

Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalPurple Medal: Super active service medal for 1000 postsBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of HonourRed Medal: Red Medal
Groups: Registered

Joined: 19/05/2015
Posts: 1,419
Points: 4,272
Location: Darmstadt, Germany
One option I'm seriously considering is doing a hull only model like the SR in Paris. With all the decorative work on the hull, the masts and rigging would only serve to distract from that.

All of the mastwork and rigging is done in the last 10 stages, so the kit kinda leaves that option in the way it's structured to just building up to stage 130 and then stopping.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2009, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.110 seconds.
DeAgostini