|
|
|
|
A new book with colourised pictures of WW1 is now out:- http://www.dailymail.co....-REALLY-looked-like.htmlCurrent builds:-C57,Zero, Lamborghini Countach, Caldercraft HMS Agamemnon,Robi,R2-D2, MFH Cobra .
|
|
|
 Rank: Pro     Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/01/2018 Posts: 455 Points: 1,365
|
Unfortunately they are not very good. Forum rules prevent me from posting a link to better examples of colourised ww1 images. Rich.
|
|
|
|
|
 They look fine to me  Current builds:-C57,Zero, Lamborghini Countach, Caldercraft HMS Agamemnon,Robi,R2-D2, MFH Cobra .
|
|
|
Rank: Pro Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/01/2018 Posts: 455 Points: 1,365
|
arpurchase wrote: They look fine to me Trust me they arn't
|
|
|
|
|
That is your opinion and your welcome to it, the pictures for most people are a different look at the past and are seen as that. If people are more inclined to look for more and better pictures after seeing those in the link then they have done there job by that very act alone. Current builds:-C57,Zero, Lamborghini Countach, Caldercraft HMS Agamemnon,Robi,R2-D2, MFH Cobra .
|
|
|
Rank: Pro Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/01/2018 Posts: 455 Points: 1,365
|
arpurchase wrote:That is your opinion and your welcome to it, the pictures for most people are a different look at the past and are seen as that. If people are more inclined to look for more and better pictures after seeing those in the link then they have done there job by that very act alone. Your right is is my opinion, but please remember it is also my professional opinion. Poor colouring of this standard is harmful, because as you said "looks fine to me" but they really are not - it one thing for amateurs to produce this standard of work but it isn't acceptable for a published piece of work. When colouring something from history great care an attention needs to take place to make sure the pictures accurately depict that moment in time. Rich.
|
|
|
Rank: Pro Groups: Joined: 24/08/2009 Posts: 48,827 Points: -13,348
|
Well the DM clearly think it's acceptable enough  
|
|
|
Rank: Pro Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/01/2018 Posts: 455 Points: 1,365
|
Tomick wrote:Well the DM clearly think it's acceptable enough DM?
|
|
|
Rank: Pro Groups: Joined: 24/08/2009 Posts: 48,827 Points: -13,348
|
TRGRichie wrote:Tomick wrote:Well the DM clearly think it's acceptable enough DM? Daily Mail - who provided the article
|
|
|
Rank: Pro Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/01/2018 Posts: 455 Points: 1,365
|
Ok let's look at it another way, a model is finished and is clearly (to you model experts) not of a good standard and it's not accurate either, but is being used for something the general public may look as being correct. You then might comment how it's not really up to standard for the use it's been given... You then might get what appear like flippant comments from people that say , looks great to me etc etc... It's something I obviously feel passionate about and as I said have no problem with amateurs colouring images but if they are to be published in a 'history book' that people will consider to be correct then they should be. If you guys can't understand this then i don't know what more I could say. Thanks Rich.
|
|
|
|
|
Being passionate about a subject is fine and welcome but imposing your opinion on others as being the only one thats valid is taking it a little far. I guess if the DM had used your images, there would be other's out there who might think they could do better. Current builds:-C57,Zero, Lamborghini Countach, Caldercraft HMS Agamemnon,Robi,R2-D2, MFH Cobra .
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
US
