Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

3 Pages <123>
Carronade Options
tomo29
#21 Posted : 13 April 2010 19:52:53

Rank: Pro


Groups: Registered

Joined: 20/03/2010
Posts: 187
Points: 526
Location: tidworth
great pics and info there lads
snowtiger
#22 Posted : 13 April 2010 19:58:05

Rank: Vice-Master
Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of Honour
Groups: Registered

Joined: 26/03/2010
Posts: 600
Points: 1,959
Location: Solway West Cumbria
Superb pics guys ....thanks BigGrin
Macmedal
#23 Posted : 14 April 2010 00:47:17

Rank: Semi-Pro Level 1

Groups: Registered

Joined: 30/03/2010
Posts: 66
Points: 191
Location: Britannia
The picture shows a strange looking block with the Corronade from the 3rd Edition magazine which does not look like a conventional block and tackle. It also differs from the Carronade block shown on the completed model. I hope we are not going to see quality issues creeping in, can someone reassure me that I am looking too deeply into this in my impatient wait to get my subscribed editions. Cursing

Macmedal attached the following image(s):
hms_e_med.jpg
V3-2.JPG
Zeptrader
#24 Posted : 14 April 2010 07:00:36

Rank: Pro

Groups: New Members, Unapproved

Joined: 24/08/2009
Posts: 48,051
Points: -13,308
my point excatly, seems we have bought up the same issues -

http://forum.model-space....aspx?g=posts&t=357


Macmedal
#25 Posted : 14 April 2010 07:57:13

Rank: Semi-Pro Level 1

Groups: Registered

Joined: 30/03/2010
Posts: 66
Points: 191
Location: Britannia
It seems we have noticed different things with the Carronade kit. Looking again closely you can see a few differences in the construction between the the two so it is clearly a different kit. I know admin has said that the magazine kit is updated from the boxed kit, but I would have hoped that the demonstration model would have been the actual kit we are going to get and not just a representation or if it has been updated it is a superior model not inferior.

I will be kit bashing (if thats what it is called) as we go along, but I hope that I am not going to have to spend a fortune and a great deal of extra time just to get things looking authentic because the base kit is inferior to what it should be. My main concern at the moment is that block and tackle, the small detail is important to me and that item does not just look like what I was expecting !

Sorry to seem like an old moaner but we are all investing a great deal of time, money and enthusiasm here and I want to make sure that as a rank amateur ship builder I am going down the right path in buying this magazine kit.
Mac
#26 Posted : 14 April 2010 10:49:01

Rank: Pro


Groups: Registered

Joined: 20/03/2010
Posts: 278
Points: 833
Location: Nottingham
Great info and pics guys thanks.
Pam's shipyard is closed for now no more room!




Tarbrush
#27 Posted : 14 April 2010 15:39:54

Rank: Pro


Groups: Registered

Joined: 21/03/2010
Posts: 270
Points: 837
Location: Nr. Dartford,
That block is definatly overscale and therefore unlikely to go on my model.Angry I wood rather have a correctly scaled plastic block than that one.Blushing Sorry, but I think you got to say what you think.LOL
Macmedal
#28 Posted : 14 April 2010 18:26:15

Rank: Semi-Pro Level 1

Groups: Registered

Joined: 30/03/2010
Posts: 66
Points: 191
Location: Britannia
The sight of the Carronade in WH Smiths led to a moment of weakness and despite still waiting for my subcriptions for Part 2 & 3 I bought it. The blocks are slightly better than anticipated but I thnk you are right they appear out of scale and the wire has also thrown me a bit. But let the fun begin ! Looking forward to seeing other peoples efforts again.
snowtiger
#29 Posted : 15 April 2010 10:26:38

Rank: Vice-Master
Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of Honour
Groups: Registered

Joined: 26/03/2010
Posts: 600
Points: 1,959
Location: Solway West Cumbria
Can't wait for this thing to arrive....as for the painting of it .....i'm still undecided..Confused
hudsonrobert49
#30 Posted : 15 April 2010 10:48:38

Rank: Pro

Outstanding Build: An award for an outstanding buildBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of Honour
Groups: Registered

Joined: 25/01/2010
Posts: 459
Points: 1,367
Location: Bridlington
LOL
Regards

Rob

Bridlington.

Built Flying Scotsman (Train). Collecting HMS VICTORY
jay7792
#31 Posted : 15 April 2010 16:22:53

Rank: Pro


Build-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of Honour
Groups: Registered

Joined: 20/03/2010
Posts: 219
Points: 585
Location: Faversham
Great pics guys.... thanks very muchBigGrin
_____________________________________

Currently building:-

Deagostini HMS Victory

Amati Black Pearl

Mamoli HMS Victory 1:90 Scale

Caldercraft HMS Victory 1:72
Tarbrush
#32 Posted : 15 April 2010 18:06:48

Rank: Pro


Groups: Registered

Joined: 21/03/2010
Posts: 270
Points: 837
Location: Nr. Dartford,
We can all make our own from those fine drawings.BigGrin Who needs kits?LOL
Macmedal
#33 Posted : 17 April 2010 08:17:18

Rank: Semi-Pro Level 1

Groups: Registered

Joined: 30/03/2010
Posts: 66
Points: 191
Location: Britannia
I have made a start on the Carronade it is deceptive how much work is required compared to to the 12 pounder. I am positioning the eyebolts slightly differently than shown in the magazine to fall in line with the Victory photos. I have also gone for the sliding slot which is shown clearly on the sliding bed of the Victory photos, quite a challenge to get that cut out but think it has gone well !
Alexhill
#34 Posted : 19 April 2010 13:06:41

Rank: Pro

Groups: New Members, Unapproved

Joined: 24/08/2009
Posts: 48,051
Points: -13,308
Does anyone know what metal the canon, corronade and anchor are made out of? I had intended on using brass blackener to get all the metal (primarily brass) parts to a nice balck/iron look. However I'd need to strip the canon, corronade etc 1st and am a little nervous that if I do that, I'll find the substance underneath is something I can't blacken.

Thanks in advance

Alex
Macmedal
#35 Posted : 19 April 2010 17:42:02

Rank: Semi-Pro Level 1

Groups: Registered

Joined: 30/03/2010
Posts: 66
Points: 191
Location: Britannia
They are not made out of brass, they are made out of a white metal alloy, so I don't know what effect your brass blackener would have of the metal !
snake
#36 Posted : 20 April 2010 02:55:20

Rank: Beginner Level 2

Groups: Registered

Joined: 19/03/2010
Posts: 13
Points: 29
In issue 3
they said it got to drill four holes in side (bottom large one)Huh
but in the picture there have 2 holes in bottom large and other 2 holes in top
should I follow everything what issue 3 say or I choose drill side holes like that picture.
sorry about my english grammer cos I'm deaf and not very well with grammerBlushing
Allan
#37 Posted : 20 April 2010 07:06:52

Rank: Pro


Groups: Registered

Joined: 23/03/2010
Posts: 202
Points: 528
Location: Bedfordshire
snake wrote:
In issue 3
they said it got to drill four holes in side (bottom large one)Huh
but in the picture there have 2 holes in bottom large and other 2 holes in top
should I follow everything what issue 3 say or I choose drill side holes like that picture.
sorry about my english grammer cos I'm deaf and not very well with grammerBlushing

If you notice there is 2 pictures the one on the left shows the positioning for the holes in the side and the picture on the right shows the holes on the top
Hope this helps
Allan
Tomick
#38 Posted : 20 April 2010 09:39:48

Rank: Pro

Groups: New Members, Unapproved

Joined: 24/08/2009
Posts: 48,051
Points: -13,308
snake wrote:
In issue 3
they said it got to drill four holes in side (bottom large one)Huh
but in the picture there have 2 holes in bottom large and other 2 holes in top
should I follow everything what issue 3 say or I choose drill side holes like that picture.
sorry about my english grammer cos I'm deaf and not very well with grammerBlushing


Drill as per this photo, i.e. in total you should have 11 holes, the 11th being for the Pivot.

Tomick attached the following image(s):
Eyebolts.JPG
snake
#39 Posted : 20 April 2010 17:25:53

Rank: Beginner Level 2

Groups: Registered

Joined: 19/03/2010
Posts: 13
Points: 29
thank you for comment, but why its show different from photo and issue 3
as you see 1-4 to drill hole but * did not show in issue 3

Capt Stedders
#40 Posted : 20 April 2010 20:16:09

Rank: Pro

Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of Honour
Groups: Registered

Joined: 02/04/2010
Posts: 491
Points: 1,460
Location: Poole
Whilst I cut the eyelets off some size 14 fish hooks (you'll need eye protection and some blu tac - see tips thread), you could make extra 'hoops' by twisting some brass wire around a thin, round object (a thick needle, a bradle or similar).

The model is supplied with some wooden blocks which are to be used to make part of the tackle (Instructions in next weeks issue #4), yet in some of the photos above the tackle is either missing or is used in combination with the thick rope that passes through the thimble, the ends of all securing ropes being tied to the hull.

Would it be correct to model both the tackle and the thick securing rope?




Schnellboots on back burner

Tools.


Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages <123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2009, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.500 seconds.
DeAgostini