Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

2 Pages 12>
bulwarks Options
willz
#1 Posted : 08 May 2010 13:30:58

Rank: Vice-Master

Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalTurquoise Medal: Turquoise Medal for model making know-how contributionOutstanding Build: An award for an outstanding buildBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of Honour
Groups: Registered

Joined: 23/03/2010
Posts: 507
Points: 1,571
the forecastle bulwarks were shoulder high at trafalgar and not knee high as she is now, I believe this kit has the knee high ones, the only model I know of that includes the high bulwarks is the jotika
Mike Turpin
#2 Posted : 08 May 2010 13:56:18

Rank: Vice-Master
Publisher Medal: Featured Build of the Month
Groups: Registered

Joined: 13/10/2011
Posts: 851
Points: 2,628
Location: Leeds, Yorkshire
willz wrote:
the forecastle bulwarks were shoulder high at trafalgar and not knee high as she is now, I believe this kit has the knee high ones, the only model I know of that includes the high bulwarks is the jotika


At the risk of another 'extended discussion' can you tell us what evidence your assertion is based on?

I have checked with C Nepean Longridge's book whose Science Museum model of Victory shows a low rail with the hammock nettings above.

Also the block model referred to in a previous post quotes:

She is shown here after her ‘great repair’ of 1800–03 when the open stern galleries were removed and closed in, and a new, simplified figurehead fitted. She never had the solid bulwarks shown here but kept the more lightweight bulwarks (frames to house the hammocks in netting, which offered limited protection to the crew against small-arms fire). Otherwise the model shows ‘Victory’ as she would have appeared at Trafalgar.

Mike T
dtgray
#3 Posted : 08 May 2010 14:51:47

Rank: Pro


Groups: Registered

Joined: 22/03/2010
Posts: 236
Points: 709
Location: Falkirk
Do I see storm clouds on the horizon? Scared
Regards,

David

snowtiger
#4 Posted : 08 May 2010 15:26:39

Rank: Vice-Master
Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of Honour
Groups: Registered

Joined: 26/03/2010
Posts: 600
Points: 1,959
Location: Solway West Cumbria
Or is it another broadside....OhMyGod OhMyGod
Mike Turpin
#5 Posted : 08 May 2010 15:29:37

Rank: Vice-Master
Publisher Medal: Featured Build of the Month
Groups: Registered

Joined: 13/10/2011
Posts: 851
Points: 2,628
Location: Leeds, Yorkshire
I most sincerely hope not David.

My concern is that we are all investing heavily in this project and I would hate to think that any models are spoilt by members of the forum being mislead by a seemingly factual statement which is unsubstantiated. Anything I have contributed to the forum has been based on at least one or another respected source and the origin quoted.

Mike T
snowtiger
#6 Posted : 08 May 2010 15:40:01

Rank: Vice-Master
Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of Honour
Groups: Registered

Joined: 26/03/2010
Posts: 600
Points: 1,959
Location: Solway West Cumbria
Mike Turpin wrote:
I most sincerely hope not David.

My concern is that we are all investing heavily in this project and I would hate to think that any models are spoilt by members of the forum being mislead by a seemingly factual statement which is unsubstantiated. Anything I have contributed to the forum has been based on at least one or another respected source and the origin quoted.

Mike T


Thats why many of us on here have adopted the (mike T) anchor....even though i'm not going for a 100% accurate model (some parts painted some not)...when i want it "Spot on"...I know who to ask...Many thanks mike for your time spent in research..BigGrin BigGrin
dtgray
#7 Posted : 08 May 2010 16:11:31

Rank: Pro


Groups: Registered

Joined: 22/03/2010
Posts: 236
Points: 709
Location: Falkirk
Mike Turpin wrote:
I most sincerely hope not David.

My concern is that we are all investing heavily in this project and I would hate to think that any models are spoilt by members of the forum being mislead by a seemingly factual statement which is unsubstantiated. Anything I have contributed to the forum has been based on at least one or another respected source and the origin quoted.

Mike T


I completely agree Mike, and I for one am grateful for your efforts Smile

I have to admit that I have come across this claim about the bulwarks being at shoulder height before. It was on another modelers website and curiously enough came up in a thread that was talking about the non existence of the Victory's entry ports on the Heller model. Sound familiar doesn't it. RollEyes

In the post he mentions that it was "now pretty widely accepted" that the bulwarks were shoulder high but I can find no reference to this claim anywhere else other than that website so I will remain sceptical until more credible evidence is forth coming.

If you are interested the thread can be found here and is the sixth post down, fifth paragraph.
Regards,

David

Mike Turpin
#8 Posted : 08 May 2010 16:29:03

Rank: Vice-Master
Publisher Medal: Featured Build of the Month
Groups: Registered

Joined: 13/10/2011
Posts: 851
Points: 2,628
Location: Leeds, Yorkshire
Hi David

That was an interesting read, a moment of pure deja vu!

I'm going to keep out of any further pointless argument and concentrate my efforts where relevant on the published sources and links, as indeed many other forum members are doing!

BTW any ideas on what format you would like for a Trincomalee visit?

Mike T
willz
#9 Posted : 08 May 2010 17:07:49

Rank: Vice-Master

Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalTurquoise Medal: Turquoise Medal for model making know-how contributionOutstanding Build: An award for an outstanding buildBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of Honour
Groups: Registered

Joined: 23/03/2010
Posts: 507
Points: 1,571
heres the quote dtgray

Mr. Bugler figured out, way back in the 1920s or thereabouts, that they'd been raised to shoulder height during the ship's last refit before Trafalgar. Dr. Anderson, who was in charge of the actual restoration, found out about that (as he acknowledged, quite handsomely and publicly, when Mr. Bugler's book was published a few years later) shortly after the carpenters had finished fabricating the knee-high, rail-and-timberhead arrangement that's on her forecastle today. Having spent a great deal of money getting that work completed, Dr. Anderson was (quite understandably, in view of the scarcity of funds for such things) reluctant to order it torn apart and replaced.

now bugler`s book cost`t over £200, and its only in three liberies, in the country,

now jotika used to supply a portsmouth conversion kit, and because of feedback stopped including it, and on some forum somewhere a customer emailed jotika to ask where the portsmouth conversion kit was, and this is the reply he got from them.

The 'Portsmouth Pack' is a separate bag of extra pieces and instructions providing everything required to build the forecastle bulwarks with timberheads, as Victory is currently in Portsmouth, rather than the solid bulwarks, as Victory was at Trafalgar. This pack was included in all of the kits sold for the first year or so of production however, feedback from customers and photos we have received showed that approximately 1 in every 25 people only were choosing to build the kit to the 'Portsmouth' configuration, as a result we chose to remove the Portsmouth Pack from the kits. The pack is still available to customers free of charge should they wish to build to the Portsmouth configuration, all we require is the kit serial number to confirm it has been registered.

If it is your intention to build Victory to the Portsmouth configuration, please let me know and I will get a pack off to you. If you are building Victory to the 1805 Trafalgar specification then there is no need for this pack.

Sincerely
Richard Wright

JoTiKa Ltd.


so richard wright acually put in print, that the shoulder high bulwark were there at tragalgar, and jokita`s model is the latest on the market using the most recent research.
dtgray
#10 Posted : 08 May 2010 17:19:18

Rank: Pro


Groups: Registered

Joined: 22/03/2010
Posts: 236
Points: 709
Location: Falkirk
Mike Turpin wrote:
Hi David

That was an interesting read, a moment of pure deja vu!

I'm going to keep out of any further pointless argument and concentrate my efforts where relevant on the published sources and links, as indeed many other forum members are doing!

BTW any ideas on what format you would like for a Trincomalee visit?

Mike T


At this point it's just a question of getting a date that will be fine for all those that want to visit. It will be a 3 to 4 hour journey for me regardless as to whether I take the car or train, but that is considerably shorter than getting to Portsmouth. BigGrin

Ideally anytime during the 2nd and 3rd weeks in August are good for me as I'll be off work so I can travel freely during those weeks. If it's earlier or later than that then it will depend on which dates are convenient for anyone else who'll be there, as my days of work vary from week to week and I'll have to work it out with the options available to others. BigGrin

Regards,

David

willz
#11 Posted : 09 May 2010 05:27:09

Rank: Vice-Master

Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalTurquoise Medal: Turquoise Medal for model making know-how contributionOutstanding Build: An award for an outstanding buildBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of Honour
Groups: Registered

Joined: 23/03/2010
Posts: 507
Points: 1,571
Mike Turpin wrote:
I most sincerely hope not David.

My concern is that we are all investing heavily in this project and I would hate to think that any models are spoilt by members of the forum being mislead by a seemingly factual statement which is unsubstantiated. Anything I have contributed to the forum has been based on at least one or another respected source and the origin quoted.

Mike T

to be honest mike t, these people on this forum are not children, can you stop please jumping in with both feet, its a forum, not what mike t says, and also provoking you can only draw you into declairing what you know on the matter which is apparently nowt. how can you possibly agree with the block model`s reference when it was you who condemned it
Mike Turpin
#12 Posted : 09 May 2010 11:29:16

Rank: Vice-Master
Publisher Medal: Featured Build of the Month
Groups: Registered

Joined: 13/10/2011
Posts: 851
Points: 2,628
Location: Leeds, Yorkshire
Mike Turpin wrote:
Hi David

That was an interesting read, a moment of pure deja vu!

I'm going to keep out of any further pointless argument and concentrate my efforts where relevant on the published sources and links, as indeed many other forum members are doing!

Mike T

Capt Stedders
#13 Posted : 09 May 2010 12:13:12

Rank: Pro

Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of Honour
Groups: Registered

Joined: 02/04/2010
Posts: 491
Points: 1,460
Location: Poole
Do I HAVE to bring the kitten out again?

Angry


Schnellboots on back burner

Tools.


Mike Turpin
#14 Posted : 09 May 2010 12:33:42

Rank: Vice-Master
Publisher Medal: Featured Build of the Month
Groups: Registered

Joined: 13/10/2011
Posts: 851
Points: 2,628
Location: Leeds, Yorkshire
dtgray wrote:
Mike Turpin wrote:
Hi David

BTW any ideas on what format you would like for a Trincomalee visit?

Mike T


At this point it's just a question of getting a date that will be fine for all those that want to visit. It will be a 3 to 4 hour journey for me regardless as to whether I take the car or train, but that is considerably shorter than getting to Portsmouth. BigGrin

Ideally anytime during the 2nd and 3rd weeks in August are good for me as I'll be off work so I can travel freely during those weeks. If it's earlier or later than that then it will depend on which dates are convenient for anyone else who'll be there, as my days of work vary from week to week and I'll have to work it out with the options available to others. BigGrin




Hi David

It's a long journey for you! I'm lucky just an hour(ish) along the road from Hartlepool.

I have looked at the Trincomalee website and they do evening tours of the ship but if we added catering(?) could be an expensive option.

I have e-mailed the Hartlepool Maritime Experience Website for suggestions as to what they can offer in the way of day-time tours. When I hear something I propose to open a new topic and invite those who are likely to be interested to offer their suggestions for how we might organise something.

Will keep you in the picture

Mike T
dtgray
#15 Posted : 09 May 2010 17:00:44

Rank: Pro


Groups: Registered

Joined: 22/03/2010
Posts: 236
Points: 709
Location: Falkirk
That sounds great Mike, thanks BigGrin
Regards,

David

Mike Turpin
#16 Posted : 09 May 2010 18:07:35

Rank: Vice-Master
Publisher Medal: Featured Build of the Month
Groups: Registered

Joined: 13/10/2011
Posts: 851
Points: 2,628
Location: Leeds, Yorkshire
I have recived a reply and set up the new topic, see what you think
HMS Trincomalee Summer 2010 Visit

Mike T
willz
#17 Posted : 13 June 2010 03:12:59

Rank: Vice-Master

Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalTurquoise Medal: Turquoise Medal for model making know-how contributionOutstanding Build: An award for an outstanding buildBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of Honour
Groups: Registered

Joined: 23/03/2010
Posts: 507
Points: 1,571
Oh my, I kinda feel a bit important like, excusing ignorance
Mac
#18 Posted : 13 June 2010 11:29:08

Rank: Pro


Groups: Registered

Joined: 20/03/2010
Posts: 278
Points: 833
Location: Nottingham
willz wrote:
Oh my, I kinda feel a bit important like, excusing ignorance



This remark is totally uncalled for. Grow up!
Pam's shipyard is closed for now no more room!




willz
#19 Posted : 14 June 2010 03:57:01

Rank: Vice-Master

Active Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalTurquoise Medal: Turquoise Medal for model making know-how contributionOutstanding Build: An award for an outstanding buildBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of Honour
Groups: Registered

Joined: 23/03/2010
Posts: 507
Points: 1,571
I have no idea why you think that members can ambush my thread, and do their best to ridicule me without any retribution. if you read the whole thread, which is mine you can see how it was ignorantly ambushed.


hence I excuse their ignoranc
but if you think that blatant ignorance is fine well you will find yourself in good company on this forum
Mac
#20 Posted : 14 June 2010 23:09:04

Rank: Pro


Groups: Registered

Joined: 20/03/2010
Posts: 278
Points: 833
Location: Nottingham
willz wrote:
I have no idea why you think that members can ambush my thread, and do their best to ridicule me without any retribution. if you read the whole thread, which is mine you can see how it was ignorantly ambushed.


hence I excuse their ignoranc
but if you think that blatant ignorance is fine well you will find yourself in good company on this forum


Willz I have taken time today to think out my reply to your post very carefully.

Firstly as publicly as I rebuked you in my last post, I would publicly now offer you my most sincere apology. My only excuse is that I read your text as possible provocation likely to restart again a previous "heated discussion".

I now understand your frustration was at a hijacked thread and how your text reflected this.

Given that is an open forum with no moderation, I'm afraid this will happen again.
You are right when you say there no excuse for ignorance but whilst we can be aware of this in ourselves, we have no control over the actions of others.

Again please accept my apology and I will attempt mind my own business.

Pam's shipyard is closed for now no more room!




Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages 12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2009, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.254 seconds.
DeAgostini