Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

F1 Chief allegedly made 'corrupt agreement' Options
arpurchase
#1 Posted : 29 October 2013 23:51:25

Rank: Super-Elite

Publisher Medal: Featured Build of the MonthActive Service Medal: 500 post active service MedalPurple Medal: Super active service medal for 1000 postsTurquoise Medal: Turquoise Medal for model making know-how contributionOutstanding Build: An award for an outstanding buildBuild-Diary Medal: Build-Diary Medal of HonourRed Medal: Red Medal
Groups: Registered

Joined: 27/09/2011
Posts: 15,196
Points: 45,687
Location: Dudley
Bernie's trail claims

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24728686#

Andy
Current builds:-C57,Zero, Lamborghini Countach, Caldercraft HMS Agamemnon,Robi,R2-D2, MFH Cobra .

Tomick
#2 Posted : 09 November 2013 15:31:32

Rank: Pro

Groups:

Joined: 24/08/2009
Posts: 48,827
Points: -13,348
Some big names into the ring..

It is claimed that F1 team bosses Eddie Jordan, Alain Prost and Tom Walkinshaw were each paid $10m in 2001 in order that they sign up to the Concorde Agreement.

The relevelation came at the High court in London, cross examination in the $100m damages case brought by German media company Constantin Medien.

Philip Marshall QC, representing Constantin, claims that the three, Eddie Jordan owner of the team which bore his name, likewise Alain Prost, and Tom Walkinhshaw who owned Arrows, were paid by bankers’ drafts from Valper Holdings, a subsidiary of Bambino Holdings, the Ecclestone’s family trust.

"They were paid to ensure that their teams did sign. Isn’t that right?” Marshall asked Ecclestone. “Yes,” he replied.

When asked why the payments were made to the individuals and not their teams, Ecclestone replied: “I’ve no idea. They were paid to sign the Concorde Agreement and that’s what they did.

“What you are inferring is these people haven’t been acting correctly," he continued, "Alain Prost and whatever.”

"Did you regard the payment of bribes to people who are not public officials as acceptable?" asked Marshall, referring to the alleged suggestion from Luc Argand, a Swiss lawyer and trustee of Bambino Holdings, who is said to have claimed that as long as the person being paid is not a public official such a payment is “not criminal”.

"This wasn't a bribe that you're referring to," replied Ecclestone.

"I'm just asking you a general question," said Marshall. "Do you regard the payment of bribes to people who are not public officials as acceptable?"

"I will have to think about that," replied Ecclestone. "I wish I would have thought about it before actually."
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2009, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.145 seconds.
DeAgostini